header-logo header-logo

14 April 2021
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

McDermott Will & Emery—Simon Airey

Global investigations and corporate crime specialist joins the team

McDermott Will & Emery today announced the addition of Simon Airey to its growing dispute resolution practice in London. Simon’s appointment further enhances the firm’s litigation and investigations proposition in the UK and globally.

Simon specialises in global investigations, financial and regulatory crime, bribery and corruption, money laundering, tax and fraud inquiries, data breaches, dawn raids and corporate compliance issues. He has conducted a wide range of litigation and investigations in many different sectors, including construction, defence, financial services, gambling, oil and gas, logistics, pharmaceuticals and telecommunications. He represents both companies and individuals in criminal and regulatory proceedings and in associated litigation. 

'Any period of economic instability invariably generates a wide range of disputes as well as regulatory-driven contentious matters,' said David S. Rosenbloom, global head of McDermott’s litigation practice group. 'We assist clients in reducing the cost, delay and uncertainty associated with complex disputes. Our aim is to protect and enhance their business and guide them towards long-term success. Simon's broad experience and successful track record in dealing with some of the most challenging issues in this space will greatly enhance our strong global investigations capability and help meet this growing client demand head on.'

Simon’s portfolio of high-profile matters includes advising several listed companies in connection with criminal and regulatory investigations and a large number of multinational groups in relation to their global compliance programmes. He assisted in the recent acquittal of a defendant in a major bribery trial in Milan relating to the OPL 245 oil block in Nigeria and is currently representing several high-profile individuals in connection with various criminal and regulatory issues in the UK. He assists clients with corporate risk assessments and pre- and post- M&A due diligence. Simon conducts tailored training for boards and senior management and has lectured around the world on a range of topics including the UK Bribery Act and the facilitation of tax evasion provisions of the UK Criminal Finances Act. 

'This is a significant step in the expansion of our London offering and fits directly with our strategic areas of international growth,” said Hamid Yunis, McDermott’s London managing partner. 'Simon’s litigation and investigations experience will provide further firepower to our successful and growing Dispute Resolution group. Having previously practised as a barrister for many years, his clients will benefit from a forensic and strategic approach to dispute resolution and sophisticated advice in navigating the complexities of regulatory investigations, cross border disputes and corporate compliance issues. His commercial approach to problem solving is fully in line with the Firm’s objective of helping clients to achieve progress against their business goals.'

In addition to leading various major tax, fraud and bribery investigations, Simon has recently defended multi-party litigation in relation to a significant data breach in the UK, dealt with an FCA investigation relating to a global payment services provider and represented a high-profile individual in relation to a multi-million pound D&O insurance dispute in the context of a U.S. DoJ prosecution. He has also advised a foreign government in relation to various tax and transparency issues and represented over 50 financial institutions served with data production orders by HM Revenue & Customs in the UK.

'I am very excited to be joining McDermott, particularly at a time of such intense regulatory activity around the world. McDermott’s multi-disciplinary, cross border approach to investigations and a sophisticated, team-based approach to client service means that they are perfectly positioned to assist clients in navigating these challenges. Their strong international network and dynamic dispute resolution practice provides an excellent platform for serving the most demanding clients. I look forward to working with colleagues at McDermott in delivering a new and innovative approach to global investigations.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

Nick Vernon of Walkers on swapping Birmingham for Bermuda and building an employment practice by the sea

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Global firm re-elects CEO for second term

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Business appoints managing director of operational excellence

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll