header-logo header-logo

12 February 2009 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7356 / Categories:
printer mail-detail

McFaddens (a firm) v Platford [2009] EWHC 126, [2009] All ER (D) 257 (Jan)

Peter Hungerford-Welch, associate dean, The City Law School, City University London. W www.city.ac.uk/law

In a claim for negligence against a barrister, the standard to be applied is that the barrister must conduct himself in his professional work with the competence (care and skill) of a barrister of ordinary skill who is competent to handle that type of, and weight of, work; a breach of that duty occurs when the error is one which no reasonably competent member of the profession possessing those skills should have made. Th e seniority of a barrister is a relevant factor in measuring the standard of care which is to be expected by a competent barrister who held himself out to be an expert in a particular field. Because of the closer relationship with the client, the barrister must rely to a greater or lesser extent on the solicitor for the factual basis on which the barrister gives his advice. On the other hand, a solicitor is generally entitled to rely on the advice of counsel based on the facts presented to him.

Issue: 7356 / Categories:
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll