header-logo header-logo

12 February 2009 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7356 / Categories:
printer mail-detail

McFaddens (a firm) v Platford [2009] EWHC 126, [2009] All ER (D) 257 (Jan)

Peter Hungerford-Welch, associate dean, The City Law School, City University London. W www.city.ac.uk/law

In a claim for negligence against a barrister, the standard to be applied is that the barrister must conduct himself in his professional work with the competence (care and skill) of a barrister of ordinary skill who is competent to handle that type of, and weight of, work; a breach of that duty occurs when the error is one which no reasonably competent member of the profession possessing those skills should have made. Th e seniority of a barrister is a relevant factor in measuring the standard of care which is to be expected by a competent barrister who held himself out to be an expert in a particular field. Because of the closer relationship with the client, the barrister must rely to a greater or lesser extent on the solicitor for the factual basis on which the barrister gives his advice. On the other hand, a solicitor is generally entitled to rely on the advice of counsel based on the facts presented to him.

Issue: 7356 / Categories:
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll