header-logo header-logo

McKenzie Friend or junior barrister?

31 May 2016
Issue: 7701 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Bar has hit out at Legal Services Board (LSB) backing for McKenzie Friends (non-qualified assistants to litigants in court).

The courts have discretion under the Legal Services Act 2007 to allow McKenzie Friends to help litigants in person. They are receiving an increasing number of applications.

Responding this week to a Judicial Executive Board consultation, Reforming the courts’ approach to McKenzie Friends, the LSB said any restriction to consumer choice should be “based on evidence of detriment” and that an outright ban was not necessary.

However, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, Chairman of the Bar, said: “The solution to government legal aid cuts, is not to allow untrained, unregulated, and uninsured McKenzie Friends to undertake reserved legal activities, such as rights of audience before the courts, and to charge for these services. 

“Some paid McKenzie Friends charge as much as £125 an hour. Many members of the junior Bar, for example, will charge around £90 an hour, and all have completed a minimum of five year’s study, including 120 hours of advocacy training and a year of working under close supervision of a senior colleague, as well as being insured and regulated.

“Those who instruct a paid McKenzie friend would be better off employing a junior barrister or solicitor. This is often more cost effective and will always represent better value for money.”

Issue: 7701 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll