header-logo header-logo

Measuring loss

15 May 2008 / Anthony Johnson
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Why is the number of vehicle diminution claims rising? And how are they assessed? Anthony Johnson reports

In most cases where a vehicle is damaged, the measure of loss is simply the cost of repairing it. However, in some cases it is argued that, even where those repairs have been carried out satisfactorily, the vehicle in question has diminished in value purely by the fact that it has been repaired. Anecdotally it seems that claims of this type are increasing, perhaps due to the prevalence of accident management companies and claims handlers that can serve to heighten claimants' awareness of additional heads of claim.

This increase in diminution claims can be contrasted with the dearth of case law providing guidance on the appropriate principles that should be applied to them; this writer's research uncovered one Court of Appeal authority from 1974, one Scottish appellate decision, one district judge-level judgment on Lawtel and a handful of brief reports on county court-level cases on current law.

The starting point in considering a claim of this type has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll