header-logo header-logo

Measuring loss

15 May 2008 / Anthony Johnson
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Why is the number of vehicle diminution claims rising? And how are they assessed? Anthony Johnson reports

In most cases where a vehicle is damaged, the measure of loss is simply the cost of repairing it. However, in some cases it is argued that, even where those repairs have been carried out satisfactorily, the vehicle in question has diminished in value purely by the fact that it has been repaired. Anecdotally it seems that claims of this type are increasing, perhaps due to the prevalence of accident management companies and claims handlers that can serve to heighten claimants' awareness of additional heads of claim.

This increase in diminution claims can be contrasted with the dearth of case law providing guidance on the appropriate principles that should be applied to them; this writer's research uncovered one Court of Appeal authority from 1974, one Scottish appellate decision, one district judge-level judgment on Lawtel and a handful of brief reports on county court-level cases on current law.

The starting point in considering a claim of this type has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll