header-logo header-logo

Measuring loss

15 May 2008 / Anthony Johnson
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Why is the number of vehicle diminution claims rising? And how are they assessed? Anthony Johnson reports

In most cases where a vehicle is damaged, the measure of loss is simply the cost of repairing it. However, in some cases it is argued that, even where those repairs have been carried out satisfactorily, the vehicle in question has diminished in value purely by the fact that it has been repaired. Anecdotally it seems that claims of this type are increasing, perhaps due to the prevalence of accident management companies and claims handlers that can serve to heighten claimants' awareness of additional heads of claim.

This increase in diminution claims can be contrasted with the dearth of case law providing guidance on the appropriate principles that should be applied to them; this writer's research uncovered one Court of Appeal authority from 1974, one Scottish appellate decision, one district judge-level judgment on Lawtel and a handful of brief reports on county court-level cases on current law.

The starting point in considering a claim of this type has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll