header-logo header-logo

Measuring progress on diversity

07 December 2022
Issue: 8006 / Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession
printer mail-detail
Nine out of ten chambers responding have adopted at least one recommendation from the Bar Council’s ‘Race at the Bar’ report last year, according to an interim progress survey.

Some 69 chambers and organisations representing 4,306 barristers responded to the survey. One third of these had taken action across all four priority areas highlighted in the report: access, retention, progression and culture.

Chambers identified a lack of people (62%) and a lack of time (61%) as the key challenges in tackling race inequality.

Just 8.7% of respondents reported not taking any action.

Bar chair Mark Fenhalls KC said: ‘We want those who have taken action to help spread their good practice to support and collaborate with others.

‘And we want those who haven’t yet started to pick just one or two actions. The Bar Council is here to support chambers, organisations and individuals with information, training, and advice.’ The progress report and other resources are available here.

Meanwhile, research published last week by non-profit social equality consultancy the Bridge Group into the Judicial Diversity Forum (JDF) has highlighted a need to set targets and milestones. The JDF, which launched in 2015, is a collective of organisations such as the Bar Council, CILEX and the Legal Services Board (LSB).

The Bridge Group researchers found most JDF members believe it needs more clearly defined aims, more coordinated actions and more collaboration between member organisations. They proposed nine high-level goals for the JDF to monitor and evaluate progress, such as ensuring that ‘at each level of the judiciary, the judiciary better reflects the society it serves’.

The researchers also suggested the JDF adopt specific and measurable descriptions of the changes it wants to achieve, and change its action plan to include group rather than individual initiatives.

Matthew Hill, chief executive of the LSB, said the JDF would incorporate the recommendations into its actions and priorities.

Issue: 8006 / Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll