header-logo header-logo

21 May 2010
Issue: 7418 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Mediation finally comes of age

Sector activity doubles in the past three years according to CEDR research
Commercial and civil mediation in the UK has grown by 30%, and mediation activity as whole has doubled, in the last three years according to the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution’s (CEDR) fourth Mediation Audit.

New research by the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution, published last week, reveals that approximately 6,000 mainstream commercial and civil cases mediated in the last year. This figure does not include workplace or small claims mediations. The total case value was £5.1bn, an increase of £1bn in the last three years.

Mediation works nine times out of ten, with about three quarters of cases settling on the day, and a further 14% settling shortly afterwards.
Clients usually make direct contact with mediators, rather than working through service organisations, and the numbers doing this has increased from 60% three years ago to 65%. The more experienced the mediator group, the more likely they are to receive direct referrals.

Even among the more experienced mediators, only 37% practise full-time.However, the fees can be lucrative. Less experienced mediators command average one-day mediation fees of £1,390, which have risen from £1,200 in 2007. Fees for more experienced mediators have risen more than 10% to £3,450 from £3,120 three years ago. About 90 individuals dominate the mediation market, being involved in about 85% of commercial cases.
Mediators blamed non-settlement on “intransigent parties, unrealistic expectations and clients on fishing expeditions”.

Conditional fee agreements (CFAs) were cited as a factor, particularly in personal injury cases, with a number of respondents citing instances “in which, due to high uplifts, claimants’ solicitors costs had become out of all proportion to the other issues in dispute, resulting in an additional barrier to settlement”.

Andy Rogers, CEDR communications manager, comments: “One of the reasons why PI has yet to fully embrace the use of mediation is because a CFA can create an additional party in the negotiations—the claimant solicitor. Mediators say that  it can feel as if the claimant solicitor can have an agenda to achieve the maximum for their client and to ensure they receive the maximum as stipulated in any conditional fee agreement.”
 

Issue: 7418 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll