header-logo header-logo

21 May 2010
Issue: 7418 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Mediation finally comes of age

Sector activity doubles in the past three years according to CEDR research
Commercial and civil mediation in the UK has grown by 30%, and mediation activity as whole has doubled, in the last three years according to the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution’s (CEDR) fourth Mediation Audit.

New research by the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution, published last week, reveals that approximately 6,000 mainstream commercial and civil cases mediated in the last year. This figure does not include workplace or small claims mediations. The total case value was £5.1bn, an increase of £1bn in the last three years.

Mediation works nine times out of ten, with about three quarters of cases settling on the day, and a further 14% settling shortly afterwards.
Clients usually make direct contact with mediators, rather than working through service organisations, and the numbers doing this has increased from 60% three years ago to 65%. The more experienced the mediator group, the more likely they are to receive direct referrals.

Even among the more experienced mediators, only 37% practise full-time.However, the fees can be lucrative. Less experienced mediators command average one-day mediation fees of £1,390, which have risen from £1,200 in 2007. Fees for more experienced mediators have risen more than 10% to £3,450 from £3,120 three years ago. About 90 individuals dominate the mediation market, being involved in about 85% of commercial cases.
Mediators blamed non-settlement on “intransigent parties, unrealistic expectations and clients on fishing expeditions”.

Conditional fee agreements (CFAs) were cited as a factor, particularly in personal injury cases, with a number of respondents citing instances “in which, due to high uplifts, claimants’ solicitors costs had become out of all proportion to the other issues in dispute, resulting in an additional barrier to settlement”.

Andy Rogers, CEDR communications manager, comments: “One of the reasons why PI has yet to fully embrace the use of mediation is because a CFA can create an additional party in the negotiations—the claimant solicitor. Mediators say that  it can feel as if the claimant solicitor can have an agenda to achieve the maximum for their client and to ensure they receive the maximum as stipulated in any conditional fee agreement.”
 

Issue: 7418 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll