header-logo header-logo

19 January 2024 / Bryan Clark , Zora Kizilyurek
Issue: 8055 / Categories: Features , Profession , Mediation , ADR
printer mail-detail

Mediation: Time to fly?

153978
From encouragement to compulsion? Mediation in English civil justice after Churchill by Bryan Clark & Zora Kizilyurek
  • Explores the meaning and significance of Churchill v Merthyr Borough Council, where it was held a judge can order parties to mediate. This overturned Halsey.
  • Asserts the decision leaves several issues yet to be resolved.

Mediation is firmly established on these shores and well-integrated into the civil justice system. With the origins of this embedding found in Lord Woolf’s reforms (Harry Woolf, Access to justice: final report (1996), mediation has since expanded through court-annexed pilot schemes, via judicial promotion and robust encouragement in the form of cost sanctions for unreasonable refusals to mediate, and most recently through the government’s intention to introduce ‘automatic referral’ to mediation for small claims disputes (Government response to Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation, Increasing the use of mediation in the civil justice system, September 2023). Automatic referral to mediation (in essence, compulsion) has also been proposed for family disputes (MoJ consultation, Supporting earlier resolution

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll