header-logo header-logo

31 March 2021
Issue: 7927 / Categories: Legal News , ADR , Family
printer mail-detail

Mediation vouchers offered to families

Lawyers have welcomed a £1m family mediation voucher scheme launched by the Ministry of Justice

The government will contribute up to £500 towards the mediation costs for eligible cases. Applicable disputes include those concerning a child, or concerning family financial matters where the parties are involved in a dispute relating to a child. About 2,000 families are likely to receive the help.

Parties must attend a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting (known as a MIAM) unless exempt before certain court proceedings can be launched. The mediator at the MIAM will discuss the voucher scheme with attending parties. The voucher can not be used for the MIAM, which costs about £90.

Neil Russell, family law partner at Seddons, said the scheme was ‘an excellent initiative.

‘No doubt the government is hoping that this will save money otherwise spent through the courts resolving family disputes concerning money and children. Mediation is often the preferred route to reduce family conflict and in the right cases can be very effective.    

‘Although the £500 may not enable the parties to complete a mediation, it might just persuade them of the benefits of mediation so that they decide to invest further in the mediation process to avoid contested court proceedings.’

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘Steps to address the backlog in the family court system are helpful.

‘However, data shows a clear and significant correlation between the removal of private family proceedings from the scope of legal aid funding and a reduction in mediations. We continue to recommend the government address this by bringing at least early advice in private family proceedings back in scope.

‘Solicitors are best placed to assess all alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options with their clients―such as arbitration, early neutral evaluation, negotiation and conciliation. We encourage a review of these other forms of ADR to ensure parties are able to access the best solution for them.’

Issue: 7927 / Categories: Legal News , ADR , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll