header-logo header-logo

Meet the new FPR!

06 January 2011 / David Burrows
Issue: 7447 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Part one: David Burrows offers some preliminary thoughts on the Family Proceedings Rules 2010

At the tail end of last year—a good time to bury bad news—a new set of family proceedings rules, Family Proceedings Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), were laid before Parliament (SI 2010/2955). They are due to come into operation on 6 April 2011.

These rules have been anticipated since Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (CPR 1998) hit the book stands in late 1998; and they have been in MoJ gestation for five years and more. The resources put into their delivery would be risible; save that they relate to a very important subject for those affected: children and some of the poorer members of society, who are now—in addition—likely to be without legal aid (to add legal aid insult to the injury of the convoluted new rules).

The committee which drafted these rules faced an almost insuperable task. They tried to comprise a substantial array of procedural, jurisdictional, case management and evidential facets to very diverse sets of family proceedings in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll