header-logo header-logo

20 November 2015 / Linda Monaci
Issue: 7677 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

​Memory block

nlj_7677_monaci

Linda Monaci considers the evidence linking traumatic brain injury & the onset of dementia

The legal implications of medical deterioration in brain injury cases and the rules governing provisional damages were discussed by Warren Collins in his recent NLJ article. As Mr Collins notes, the court can award provisional damages if the risk of disease or deterioration has a “measurable chance of occurring”, while the disease or deterioration must be “serious”. (see “Pushing boundaries”, NLJ , 24 April 2015, p 13). This article presents some of the challenges which complicate carrying out research in this field, and provides a brief overview of the findings.

Established findings & mixed results

It is an established finding that repeated mild traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), such as those experienced by professional boxers, are associated with a high risk of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), originally termed “dementia pugilistica” (McKee et al, 2012). CTE is a type of dementia with distinctive neuropathological features, but clinically it can be mistaken for Alzheimer’s disease or fronto-temporal dementia (Gavett et al, 2010;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
back-to-top-scroll