header-logo header-logo

Men at the Bar earn more

02 November 2022
Issue: 8001 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity
printer mail-detail
Women barristers earn one third less than their male colleagues, Bar Council analysis has found.

Moreover, the earnings gap increased in certain practice areas. In immigration, earnings decreased overall and the gap widened from 33% to 38% in 2021. In contentious chancery, earnings rose overall, but women earned 39% less than men (compared to 38% less in 2020). In personal injury, fee income decreased overall, and women earned 53% less than men (52% in 2020).

However, earnings gender equality improved among those practising in commercial and financial services law (from a 57% gap to 51%), in crime (from 38% to 35%) and in employment law (from 16% to 6%).

Conversely, women barristers earn more than men in only two areas—defamation (women earn 36% more) and family (children) (women have always out-earned men in this area and earned 3% more in 2021). However, men out-earned women by 43% in family (other).

The data is taken from the Bar Council’s report, published last week, ‘Barrister earnings by sex and practice area: 2022 update’, and shows the gap between men and women’s earnings overall has reduced from 39% in 2020 to 34% in 2021. This was due to men earning 5% less and women 6% more, which may be an anomaly caused by the pandemic.

The report is compiled using anonymous income data from self-employed barristers shared by Bar Mutual Insurance Fund during the professional insurance renewal process.

Chair of the Bar Mark Fenhalls KC said: ‘This year’s data analysis shows there remains a long way to go to close the earnings gap, particularly in the higher earning practice areas.

‘Through the Bar Council’s modernising the Bar programme we are focused on evidence-based and practical actions to tackle inequalities at the Bar. Chambers can make a significant difference through ensuring fair distribution of work, including briefing practices, marketing opportunities, and support for new barristers and those returning to the Bar.’

Issue: 8001 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll