header-logo header-logo

02 November 2022
Issue: 8001 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity
printer mail-detail

Men at the Bar earn more

Women barristers earn one third less than their male colleagues, Bar Council analysis has found.

Moreover, the earnings gap increased in certain practice areas. In immigration, earnings decreased overall and the gap widened from 33% to 38% in 2021. In contentious chancery, earnings rose overall, but women earned 39% less than men (compared to 38% less in 2020). In personal injury, fee income decreased overall, and women earned 53% less than men (52% in 2020).

However, earnings gender equality improved among those practising in commercial and financial services law (from a 57% gap to 51%), in crime (from 38% to 35%) and in employment law (from 16% to 6%).

Conversely, women barristers earn more than men in only two areas—defamation (women earn 36% more) and family (children) (women have always out-earned men in this area and earned 3% more in 2021). However, men out-earned women by 43% in family (other).

The data is taken from the Bar Council’s report, published last week, ‘Barrister earnings by sex and practice area: 2022 update’, and shows the gap between men and women’s earnings overall has reduced from 39% in 2020 to 34% in 2021. This was due to men earning 5% less and women 6% more, which may be an anomaly caused by the pandemic.

The report is compiled using anonymous income data from self-employed barristers shared by Bar Mutual Insurance Fund during the professional insurance renewal process.

Chair of the Bar Mark Fenhalls KC said: ‘This year’s data analysis shows there remains a long way to go to close the earnings gap, particularly in the higher earning practice areas.

‘Through the Bar Council’s modernising the Bar programme we are focused on evidence-based and practical actions to tackle inequalities at the Bar. Chambers can make a significant difference through ensuring fair distribution of work, including briefing practices, marketing opportunities, and support for new barristers and those returning to the Bar.’

Issue: 8001 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll