header-logo header-logo

15 December 2011
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Mental Health

AB (by his litigation friend NW) v A local authority and another [2011] EWHC 3151 (COP), [2011] All ER (D) 37 (Dec)

There was no impediment to a relevant person’s representative (RPR) acting as a litigation friend to a patient in an application under s 21A of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 provided that: the RPR was not already a party to the proceedings; the RPR fulfilled the conditions set out in r 140 of the Court of Protection Rules; the RPR could and was willing to act as litigation friend in the patient’s best interests; and the procedure as set out in r 143 of the Rules was complied with.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths strengthens national tax team with Heather Gibson appointment

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

NEWS
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
A client cannot use a costs assessment to investigate whether their solicitor received commission on an after-the-event (ATE) insurance premium, the Court of Appeal has held
Law firms cannot be compelled to disclose documents protected by unwaived legal professional privilege (LPP) during misconduct investigations, the High Court has clarified
Solicitors have urged regulators not to impose unnecessary cost and complexity on third-party litigation funding
International demand for UK legal services is surging, with exports at record levels, according to Law Society research
back-to-top-scroll