header-logo header-logo

06 October 2017 / Keith Wilding
Issue: 7764 / Categories: Features , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Mental health & the case for tribunals

nlj_7764_wilding

Keith Wilding believes there is much to recommend an expansion of the tribunal adjudication system

  • Current safeguarding laws are fragmented and complex.
  • The Law Commission has recommended a review of deprivation of liberty safeguards.

In May 2017, the Prime Minister suggested that the ‘flawed’ Mental Health Act 1983 should be replaced. The 1983 Act is only one aspect of legislation in the area of law dealing with matters of mental health, mental incapacity, and vulnerability.

The Law Commission’s final report on Mental Capacity and Deprivation of Liberty (Law Comm No 372 (Summary)) in discussing the rights of challenge to authorisations of deprivations of liberty recommends (at para 86) reviewing the question of the appropriate judicial body for determining such challenges. This seems to be a clear indication that the role of the First-tier Tribunal (a mental health tribunal) should be considered as the forum for such adjudication. There is much to recommend an expansion of the tribunal adjudication system both from the perspective of the person in respect of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll