header-logo header-logo

MENTAL HEALTH DEFEAT

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health
printer mail-detail

In brief

The government suffered three defeats in the House of Lords over plans to detain mental health patients where they have not committed an offence. The Mental Health Bill contains powers for people with severe personality disorders to be detained if judged a threat to themselves or others. However, its passage through Parliament has been a rocky one. This week peers voted to reduce the criteria for detention; to ensure treatment can only be given if it is likely to help; and for a doctor to have the final say in any decision to renew a patient’s detention or community treatment order.

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll