header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health
printer mail-detail

MENTAL HEALTH DEFEAT

In brief

The government suffered three defeats in the House of Lords over plans to detain mental health patients where they have not committed an offence. The Mental Health Bill contains powers for people with severe personality disorders to be detained if judged a threat to themselves or others. However, its passage through Parliament has been a rocky one. This week peers voted to reduce the criteria for detention; to ensure treatment can only be given if it is likely to help; and for a doctor to have the final say in any decision to renew a patient’s detention or community treatment order.

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll