header-logo header-logo

Mentoring for the High Court

16 April 2015
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Potential High Court candidates from non-traditional backgrounds are to be given mentoring and support under a new judicial diversity pilot.

First, the next Judicial Appointments Commission selection exercise for up to 14 Deputy High Court fee paid (part-time) posts, in July, will not insist on previous fee paid judicial experience.

Second, work-shadowing and mentoring opportunities will be provided to a small number of candidates without previous judicial experience. They can also attend a one-day workshop where they will receive guidance.

Once appointed, the Deputy High Court Judges will be given training and an opportunity to sit in the High Court for up to 30 days so they can compete on a level playing field in the 2016 and 2017 High Court selection exercises.

Introducing the scheme, Lady Justice Hallett said sitting as a High Court Judge was “one of the toughest legal jobs there is” but “also one of the most satisfying and intellectually rewarding”.

Applications close on 21 April.

Issue: 7648 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll