header-logo header-logo

Mergers: is there safety in numbers?

07 August 2014
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Research illustrates rising trend for law firm mergers over past year

Mergers between law firms have soared 65% in the past year.

Some 385 mergers took place in 2013, up from 234 in 2012, according to accountants Wilkins Kennedy, as the legal sector consolidated to save on costs. Larger firms snapped up smaller players to make themselves more profitable and combat increased competition from other legal services, providers, the accountancy firm said.

For example, last year Norton Rose merged with US firm Fulbright & Jaworski in June; Wragge & Co merged with City firm Lawrence Graham in May; and Manches joined Penningtons in October, after Manches ran into difficulties. By comparison, there were just 146 mergers in the same 12-month period five years ago.

Tommy White, partner at Wilkins Kennedy, says: “These figures show that the rising trend for mergers shows no signs of slowing down, as financial pressures, increased competition, and to a perhaps lesser extent regulatory issues, are still having a major impact.

“M&A, corporate finance and property work for lawyers, particularly in the south of the country are all recovering but are generally still below the heady days of pre-2007. In addition the long term, secular decline in litigation work continues—despite a helping hand from recession linked disputes. While some firms need to find a white knight quickly in order to stave off potential financial collapse, others are turning to mergers to deliver that boost in profitability that a merger will achieve from cost savings. Economies of scale from a merger—especially where the merged firms can better utilise staffing levels—can be substantial.”

White says there has also been an increase in mergers aimed at gaining access to new sectors and services or to achieve wider exposure overseas. “The drive for consolidation appears to be more, not less, pressing as we leave recession behind,” he says.

Smaller firms, in particular, are under pressure from measures such as the ban on referral fees for personal injury cases, changes to legal aid and conditional fee arrangements as well as increased competition following the liberalisation of the legal services market, he adds.

Issue: 7618 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll