header-logo header-logo

02 April 2019
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Mewburn Ellis

IP firm adds three partners & creates three directors

Specialist IP firm Mewburn Ellis has announced a host of promotions across the firm, including a number of appointments to the newly created position of director.

Among the moves are the promotions of three members to the partnership: Sarah Kostiuk-Smith, Jacqueline Pang and Eliot Ward. Sarah, who joined the firm in 2011, is a chartered patent attorney and a European patent attorney. She works within the firm’s chemistry practice group, advising key clients from the pharmaceutical and nanotech sectors on a wide range of patent issues.

Jacqueline also joined the firm in 2011, and is a qualified UK registered trade mark attorney. She advises on international filing strategies and domain name dispute resolution proceedings across sectors including consumer products, computer software and retail. Eliot, who joined the life sciences practice in 2011, is a European patent attorney and a chartered patent attorney. He focuses on patent matters relating to the biotechnology sector, including offensive and defensive opposition proceedings.

In addition, the firm has made a number of appointments to its new position of director (comparable to a junior partner role). Elizabeth Dale and Rhiannon Wescott have been promoted to patent directors, and Sofia Arenal will take up the role of trade mark director.

Joanna Cripps (pictured), partner at Mewburn Ellis, commented: ‘Mewburn’s strong growth has been testament to the commitment and ability of everyone in the firm. These promotions are therefore greatly deserved and reflect the market-leading abilities we possess throughout the business. I very much look forward to working together with the team as we embark on the next phase of our growth.

‘As a forward-looking firm, we continually look for ways to modernise and our new director role is the latest example of this. We know that the traditional partner route may not be right for all our fee-earners, so this position was designed to provide an alternative structure to better fit their ambitions and work-life balance. Rather than expecting people to fit a certain mould, we strive to ensure that Mewburn provides the flexibility to ensure our professionals succeed in a way that suits them best.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Devonshires—Rebecca Eastwood

Devonshires—Rebecca Eastwood

Housing management and property litigation practice strengthened by Leeds partner hire

Trowers & Hamlins—Rahul Sagar

Trowers & Hamlins—Rahul Sagar

Banking and finance practice bolstered by partner hire

mfg Solicitors—Ian Sheppard

mfg Solicitors—Ian Sheppard

Commercial litigation team welcomes senior associate in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll