header-logo header-logo

MIB: national treasure or pariah?

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Part one: Nicholas Bevan explains why the Motor Insurers Bureau is ripe for reform





It is often said that familiarity breeds

contempt. The Motor Insurers

Bureau (MIB) has been around for

approximately 63 years and in that time

it has provided a crucial compensatory

lifeline to countless thousands of victims

of negligent uninsured motorists. It plays

a vital role in the framework of different

protective measures that are designed to

ensure that road accident victims recover

their full compensatory entitlement.

While its public profile may be eclipsed

by road user membership groups such

as the Automobile Association (founded

in 1897), the service it provides is

potentially far more crucial—particularly

for those who are unfortunate enough to

be victims of one of the approximately

1.5 million uninsured drivers who plague

our roads.

And yet for all this, the MIB does not

enjoy the universal esteem of claimant

representatives; indeed it is coming under

increasing pressure for radical reform to

the way in which it compensates these

victims.

A decade of change

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll