header-logo header-logo

03 November 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Dual-qualified partner joins London disputes practice

Michelman Robinson has appointed Akshay Sewlikar as a partner in its commercial and business litigation practice, further enhancing the firm’s international arbitration, complex litigation and investigations capabilities. Dual-qualified in India and in England and Wales, Akshay advises corporates, financial institutions and sovereigns on high-stakes disputes and regulatory inquiries spanning international arbitration, English High Court litigation and cross-border investigations.

Akshay brings more than a decade of experience in proceedings under LCIA, ICC, SIAC and DIFC rules, with particular expertise acting for and against states and state-owned entities. His track record includes major sovereign bond disputes, regulatory inquiries and commercial fraud cases, as well as involvement in the first-ever financial fair play proceedings against Everton FC. Recognised as a ‘key lawyer’ by The Legal 500, he joins from Linklaters, where he was a managing associate in the arbitration and litigation group.

Sanford Michelman, the firm’s chairman and co-founder, said: ‘Akshay is a world-class disputes lawyer with the international perspective and depth of experience that reflects exactly what we’re building here in London. His arrival signals our intent to attract top-tier talent who can offer immediate value to clients.’

Akshay commented: ‘This is an exciting time to be joining Michelman Robinson. The London office is growing with real momentum, and the firm’s energy, ambition and cross-border outlook immediately resonated with me. I’m looking forward to helping shape our London disputes and investigations offering from the ground up.’ His appointment follows the firm’s London launch and expansion of its corporate crime and investigations group, marking another step in Michelman Robinson’s international growth strategy.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll