header-logo header-logo

16 September 2010 / Mike Griffiths
Issue: 7433 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Situation Critical

The effective taking of guarantees is a critical stage in the provision of finance by banks and similar institutions.

However, in spite of the huge amount of litigation on the topic over recent years, it is astonishing just how many guarantees are still not properly taken.

The last major examination of the law governing the taking of guarantees by the House of Lords was in the case of Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge [2001] 4 All ER 449. In this Lord Nichols set out guidelines which, if properly followed, should ensure that any guarantee was as close to being beyond the possibility of challenge as may be. In this article, for clarity the scenario will be that the husband is the businessman and that it is his wife who is being asked to provide the guarantee. However, this is done merely for clarity of expression and Lord Nichols made it quite clear that the principles he set out would apply in any other relationship.

Proof that a surety, trying to obtain relief from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll