header-logo header-logo

16 September 2010 / Mike Griffiths
Issue: 7433 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Situation Critical

The effective taking of guarantees is a critical stage in the provision of finance by banks and similar institutions.

However, in spite of the huge amount of litigation on the topic over recent years, it is astonishing just how many guarantees are still not properly taken.

The last major examination of the law governing the taking of guarantees by the House of Lords was in the case of Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge [2001] 4 All ER 449. In this Lord Nichols set out guidelines which, if properly followed, should ensure that any guarantee was as close to being beyond the possibility of challenge as may be. In this article, for clarity the scenario will be that the husband is the businessman and that it is his wife who is being asked to provide the guarantee. However, this is done merely for clarity of expression and Lord Nichols made it quite clear that the principles he set out would apply in any other relationship.

Proof that a surety, trying to obtain relief from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll