header-logo header-logo

10 January 2018
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Mind the equality wage gap

Law firms have begun publicly reporting their gender pay gap, as all employers with more than 250 employees are legally required to do by April.

CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang reports no earnings differential among fee earners apart from ‘minimal pay gaps’ in its Bristol office, but across all its UK employees, it found a 32.8% median hourly earnings gap and a 17.3% mean hourly pay gap. It attributes this discrepancy partly to ‘the disproportionate female to male ratio in the firm, particularly in business support teams, as well as the high numbers of part-time female workers’ and says it is committed to working hard to improve these statistics.

Similar sentiments are expressed by Herbert Smith Freehills, which reports a 39% median hourly earnings gap and a 19% mean hourly rate gap. Shoosmiths reports a 13% median and 15% mean hourly rate gap.

Claire Rowe, CEO of Shoosmiths, said the firm was pleased its median pay gap was above the national average but recognised there was still more work to be done.

Issue: 7776 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll