header-logo header-logo

08 January 2016 / Sarah Johnson
Issue: 7681 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Mind the gap

Sarah Johnson reports on the gender pay gap

The gender pay gap overall in the UK is 19.1%, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

Attempts have been made before to close the pay gap. “Think, Act, Report” was a voluntary reporting initiative launched in 2011. Over 280 organisations signed up, but only four employers published the information. Wonder why?

Statistics can be unreliable, but there is clearly a problem. The government is proposing to address this by introducing mandatory gender pay gap reporting for larger employers. Evidence suggests that, for full-timers under 40, there is little difference between male and female earnings. Hopefully, increased transparency may reduce the remaining gaps.

Section 78 of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) provides a power to create regulations requiring employers with 250 or more “employees” to report gender pay gap information. The government’s consultation on closing the pay gap closed on 6 September. The results are to be published this winter with draft regulations expected in the first half of 2016. There may be phased implementation with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll