header-logo header-logo

08 January 2016 / Sarah Johnson
Issue: 7681 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Mind the gap

Sarah Johnson reports on the gender pay gap

The gender pay gap overall in the UK is 19.1%, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

Attempts have been made before to close the pay gap. “Think, Act, Report” was a voluntary reporting initiative launched in 2011. Over 280 organisations signed up, but only four employers published the information. Wonder why?

Statistics can be unreliable, but there is clearly a problem. The government is proposing to address this by introducing mandatory gender pay gap reporting for larger employers. Evidence suggests that, for full-timers under 40, there is little difference between male and female earnings. Hopefully, increased transparency may reduce the remaining gaps.

Section 78 of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) provides a power to create regulations requiring employers with 250 or more “employees” to report gender pay gap information. The government’s consultation on closing the pay gap closed on 6 September. The results are to be published this winter with draft regulations expected in the first half of 2016. There may be phased implementation with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll