header-logo header-logo

Mind the gap

08 January 2016 / Sarah Johnson
Issue: 7681 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Sarah Johnson reports on the gender pay gap

The gender pay gap overall in the UK is 19.1%, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

Attempts have been made before to close the pay gap. “Think, Act, Report” was a voluntary reporting initiative launched in 2011. Over 280 organisations signed up, but only four employers published the information. Wonder why?

Statistics can be unreliable, but there is clearly a problem. The government is proposing to address this by introducing mandatory gender pay gap reporting for larger employers. Evidence suggests that, for full-timers under 40, there is little difference between male and female earnings. Hopefully, increased transparency may reduce the remaining gaps.

Section 78 of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) provides a power to create regulations requiring employers with 250 or more “employees” to report gender pay gap information. The government’s consultation on closing the pay gap closed on 6 September. The results are to be published this winter with draft regulations expected in the first half of 2016. There may be phased implementation with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll