header-logo header-logo

01 March 2018 / Steven Davies
Issue: 7783 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Mine not yours?

nlj_7783_davies

Steven Davies reports on a new frontier in the ‘costs war’ & the threat of increased satellite litigation

Costs-related arguments have always had a habit for creating satellite litigation and a recent flurry of cases indicates that the newest outbreak of the ‘costs war’ comes from solicitor-client costs disputes over deductions made from damages to pay their solicitor’s costs in personal injury cases.

The 2013 Jackson reforms essentially authorised the deduction of costs to a maximum of 25% of the damages recovered, which has caused an increased focus from clients on their legal bills. Three recent cases, decided in the Senior Courts Costs Office, are discussed below.

Costs bill challenge

Green & Ors v SGI Legal LLP [2017] EWHC B27 (Costs) was heard by Master Leonard. The four former clients of Liverpool firm SGI Legal had wanted copies of the documents to challenge a costs bill, and applied for disclosure of copies of funding documents, copies of all correspondence sent to them and copies

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll