header-logo header-logo

Misconduct outside of legal practice (Pt 2)

18 November 2020 / John Gould
Issue: 7911 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail
32370
John Gould considers the characteristics which should mark outside conduct as professional misconduct

In brief

  • Existing concepts and approach can obscure the basis upon which the facts of outside conduct should be considered.
  • Whether tribunal decisions and regulators’ policies apply principles consistently and transparently.

In the first part of this article I suggested that in order for conduct outside of practice to be the proper concern of a regulator, it should be both serious and demonstrably relevant to practice. The standard should be that required of a solicitor outside of practice, not a well-behaved member of the public and that standard has to be set on the basis of the requirements of practice not any notion of general ethical worth.

I also cast doubt on two concepts commonly used in allegations to establish a connection between outside conduct and legal practice. These were rules requiring the upholding of the rule of law and the maintenance of public confidence in lawyers.

In this second part, I am

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll