header-logo header-logo

Misleading scratch cards unlawful

24 October 2012
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Prize-draw promoters have hands slapped by ECJ

Prize-draw promotions that mislead consumers into thinking they have won a valuable prize or encourage them to call premium-rate numbers may be unlawful, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled.

Last February, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) successfully sought a High Court injunction preventing several companies and individuals from promoting prize-draw scratch cards which it considered misleading, through magazines and newspapers or by direct mail. This was the first case to reach the courts under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1277).

The regulations prohibit businesses from describing a product as “free” when it’s not or creating a false impression that the consumer will win a prize.

The OFT objected to several promotions involving individually addressed letters, scratch cards and advertising inserts placed into newspapers and magazines. All but one encouraged the consumer to call a premium rate number, and 99% of all winners won a prize worth just a few pounds.

The Court of Appeal asked the ECJ for guidance. The ECJ noted the psychological effect on consumers of being told they had won a prize, agreed with the OFT’s position, and set out guidance for trader behaviour.

Peter Stevens, partner at TWM Solicitors, says: “It will be interesting to see how such prize promotions change in the future. 

“Promoters will either have to be much more up front about the value of the prizes which are likely to be won and the costs involved in collecting them, or the promoters will have to absorb all such costs and, presumably, reduce the value of the prizes accordingly.”

Issue: 7535 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll