header-logo header-logo

24 October 2012
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Misleading scratch cards unlawful

Prize-draw promoters have hands slapped by ECJ

Prize-draw promotions that mislead consumers into thinking they have won a valuable prize or encourage them to call premium-rate numbers may be unlawful, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled.

Last February, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) successfully sought a High Court injunction preventing several companies and individuals from promoting prize-draw scratch cards which it considered misleading, through magazines and newspapers or by direct mail. This was the first case to reach the courts under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1277).

The regulations prohibit businesses from describing a product as “free” when it’s not or creating a false impression that the consumer will win a prize.

The OFT objected to several promotions involving individually addressed letters, scratch cards and advertising inserts placed into newspapers and magazines. All but one encouraged the consumer to call a premium rate number, and 99% of all winners won a prize worth just a few pounds.

The Court of Appeal asked the ECJ for guidance. The ECJ noted the psychological effect on consumers of being told they had won a prize, agreed with the OFT’s position, and set out guidance for trader behaviour.

Peter Stevens, partner at TWM Solicitors, says: “It will be interesting to see how such prize promotions change in the future. 

“Promoters will either have to be much more up front about the value of the prizes which are likely to be won and the costs involved in collecting them, or the promoters will have to absorb all such costs and, presumably, reduce the value of the prizes accordingly.”

Issue: 7535 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll