header-logo header-logo

Misleading scratch cards unlawful

24 October 2012
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Prize-draw promoters have hands slapped by ECJ

Prize-draw promotions that mislead consumers into thinking they have won a valuable prize or encourage them to call premium-rate numbers may be unlawful, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled.

Last February, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) successfully sought a High Court injunction preventing several companies and individuals from promoting prize-draw scratch cards which it considered misleading, through magazines and newspapers or by direct mail. This was the first case to reach the courts under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1277).

The regulations prohibit businesses from describing a product as “free” when it’s not or creating a false impression that the consumer will win a prize.

The OFT objected to several promotions involving individually addressed letters, scratch cards and advertising inserts placed into newspapers and magazines. All but one encouraged the consumer to call a premium rate number, and 99% of all winners won a prize worth just a few pounds.

The Court of Appeal asked the ECJ for guidance. The ECJ noted the psychological effect on consumers of being told they had won a prize, agreed with the OFT’s position, and set out guidance for trader behaviour.

Peter Stevens, partner at TWM Solicitors, says: “It will be interesting to see how such prize promotions change in the future. 

“Promoters will either have to be much more up front about the value of the prizes which are likely to be won and the costs involved in collecting them, or the promoters will have to absorb all such costs and, presumably, reduce the value of the prizes accordingly.”

Issue: 7535 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll