header-logo header-logo

Mitchell: cut out & keep

05 June 2014 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7609 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail
web_lawintheheadlines_mitchell-cut-out-keep_regan

Dominic Regan provides a self-help guide post-Mitchell

No procedural decision has created so much pain and paranoia as that of Lord Dyson MR in Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1537, [2014] 2 All ER 430. What follows are a few suggestions which will help litigators sleep at night:

  1. When first instructed by any client write and emphasise that you must have their full and immediate cooperation throughout. Otherwise, there will be a real danger that, no matter how strong their case, it could be dismissed for failure to abide by court orders and deadlines. It would be prudent to convey the same message to your experts as well.
  2. If claimant, only issue, subject to limitation, when comfortable. Do not rush into proceedings when ill-prepared. You need to be in control and on top of each matter. When proposing directions build in a layer of breathing space. Do not be over-optimistic about how quickly steps can be taken.
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Druces LLP—Daniel Lloyd

Druces LLP—Daniel Lloyd

Corporate and commercial team welcomes technology specialist as partner

Birketts—Michael Conway

Birketts—Michael Conway

IP partner joins team in Bristol to lead branding and trade marks practice

Spector Constant & Williams—Anna Christou

Spector Constant & Williams—Anna Christou

Real estate finance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
back-to-top-scroll