header-logo header-logo

04 September 2014
Issue: 7620 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

MoJ fined

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has been fined £180,000 for repeated security failings.

The penalty, served by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), follows the loss of a back-up hard drive at HMP Erlestoke prison in Wiltshire in May 2013. The unencrypted hard drive contained sensitive and confidential information about 2,935 prisoners.

In October 2011, an unencrypted hard drive containing information on 16,000 prisoners at HMP High Down prison in Surrey was lost. Following this, the prison service provided new hard drives to all 75 prisons in England and Wales. However, the ICO found that the prison service didn’t realise the encryption option had to be turned on to work correctly.

ICO head of enforcement, Stephen Eckersley, says: “The fact that a government department with security oversight for prisons can supply equipment to 75 prisons throughout England and Wales without properly understanding, let alone telling them, how to use it beggars belief.”

Issue: 7620 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll