header-logo header-logo

MoJ will evaluate remote hearings

25 November 2020
Issue: 7912 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail
‘Substantial investment’ being made into criminal court infrastructure
A formal, independent evaluation will be commissioned into the use of video hearings in criminal cases during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has confirmed in its response to the Justice Select Committee.

The MoJ is also planning a fully video remand pilot, building on knowledge gained during the pandemic, but this would be ‘subject to engagement and agreement with the judiciary’. It said ‘substantial investment’ was being made into criminal court infrastructure to support video hearings, with 50% of all courtrooms given video hearing facilities, and a second tranche of roll-put planned to increase this to 75%.

However, ministers have no intention of revisiting provision where court buildings have been closed.

In its report on the impact of coronavirus on courts and tribunals, in July (bit.ly/363twyj) the Committee said the government had been wrong to close so much of the court estate in the ten years prior to the pandemic, and warned the crisis should not be used to bring in permanent changes without proper consultation.

Responding this week to the Justice Committee report, the MoJ said: ‘As HM Courts and Tribunal Service recover from the impact of the coronavirus pandemic their focus will be on improving the existing estate through the additional funding received earlier this year and by making a robust case for additional funding as part of the spending review process.

‘Beyond the recent consultation on Medway County and Family Court, they have no further active proposals for changes to the court and tribunal estate.’

In response to other questions from the Committee, the MoJ said it was investigating the costs of setting up a freephone service for members of the public.

Law Society president David Greene said: ‘Case backlogs are significant across both the civil and criminal justice systems.

‘To help clear the backlogs, we encourage the government to open additional Nightingale courts. Investing in legal aid for early advice and legal representation would help to nip problems in the bud, thus avoiding some cases going to court at all.’

While remote hearings have been successful, people needed to be physically present in some cases, particularly those involving vulnerable parties.

Issue: 7912 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll