header-logo header-logo

Money talks

19 September 2013 / Mark James
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail
83988352

Elvanite provides an important lesson in costs budgeting, says Mark James

Costs budgeting has been with us for nearly six months now. Most practitioners still have little experience of filling in a Form H. What they all have is a fear that they might get it wrong and that, as a consequence, their winning client may not be able to recover reasonable and proportionate costs from the losing party; and, that their firm may be asked by the aggrieved client to make up the shortfall by writing off part or all of its fees. At the heart of this fear is uncertainty as to how much leeway the court will give a solicitor who has made a mistake in his budget. The mixed messages from the courts have not helped. Under the pre-April 2013 pilot schemes the courts talked tough but, when it came to it, the decisions were sympathetic to the erring party. Thus, in Henry v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll