header-logo header-logo

19 September 2013 / Mark James
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Money talks

83988352

Elvanite provides an important lesson in costs budgeting, says Mark James

Costs budgeting has been with us for nearly six months now. Most practitioners still have little experience of filling in a Form H. What they all have is a fear that they might get it wrong and that, as a consequence, their winning client may not be able to recover reasonable and proportionate costs from the losing party; and, that their firm may be asked by the aggrieved client to make up the shortfall by writing off part or all of its fees. At the heart of this fear is uncertainty as to how much leeway the court will give a solicitor who has made a mistake in his budget. The mixed messages from the courts have not helped. Under the pre-April 2013 pilot schemes the courts talked tough but, when it came to it, the decisions were sympathetic to the erring party. Thus, in Henry v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll