header-logo header-logo

11 December 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Moore Barlow—Joanna Earl, Thomas Denman & Lauren Johnson

Private wealth disputes team expands in Surrey with new solicitor trio

Moore Barlow has strengthened its private wealth disputes team with the appointment of three new solicitors, underscoring the firm’s continued investment in this growing practice area and marking the team as one of the largest outside London. Newly qualified solicitors Joanna Earl and Thomas Denman, who both trained at the firm, join alongside Lauren Johnson, an experienced solicitor arriving from Blandy & Blandy LLP.

Earl, who qualified in September, was attracted to Moore Barlow by its supportive culture, strong focus on career progression and high proportion of female partners. She has already established herself within the wider legal community, serving as vice president of the Surrey Junior Lawyer Division and as the Southwest London regional contact for LegalRunner. Denman, who qualified via the SQE route, chose to remain with the firm for its diverse practice areas, quality work and commitment to work-life balance.

Johnson brings more than six years of experience, including two years as a qualified solicitor, having worked across private wealth disputes, commercial disputes and property litigation in both the County Courts and High Court. Now specialising in private wealth disputes, she handles inheritance act matters, capacity-related claims, contested estates and TOLATA cases.

Scott Taylor, head of private wealth disputes, said he is ‘delighted to welcome Joanna, Thomas and Lauren’, noting that retaining Earl and Denman ‘speaks volumes about the quality of talent we’re developing’. He added that Johnson brings ‘excellent experience and a strong track record’ that will deepen the team’s capability. Their arrival follows the firm’s successful September intake, which saw eight newly qualified solicitors retained across several practice areas.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll