header-logo header-logo

Moore Barlow—Joanna Earl, Thomas Denman & Lauren Johnson

11 December 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Private wealth disputes team expands in Surrey with new solicitor trio

Moore Barlow has strengthened its private wealth disputes team with the appointment of three new solicitors, underscoring the firm’s continued investment in this growing practice area and marking the team as one of the largest outside London. Newly qualified solicitors Joanna Earl and Thomas Denman, who both trained at the firm, join alongside Lauren Johnson, an experienced solicitor arriving from Blandy & Blandy LLP.

Earl, who qualified in September, was attracted to Moore Barlow by its supportive culture, strong focus on career progression and high proportion of female partners. She has already established herself within the wider legal community, serving as vice president of the Surrey Junior Lawyer Division and as the Southwest London regional contact for LegalRunner. Denman, who qualified via the SQE route, chose to remain with the firm for its diverse practice areas, quality work and commitment to work-life balance.

Johnson brings more than six years of experience, including two years as a qualified solicitor, having worked across private wealth disputes, commercial disputes and property litigation in both the County Courts and High Court. Now specialising in private wealth disputes, she handles inheritance act matters, capacity-related claims, contested estates and TOLATA cases.

Scott Taylor, head of private wealth disputes, said he is ‘delighted to welcome Joanna, Thomas and Lauren’, noting that retaining Earl and Denman ‘speaks volumes about the quality of talent we’re developing’. He added that Johnson brings ‘excellent experience and a strong track record’ that will deepen the team’s capability. Their arrival follows the firm’s successful September intake, which saw eight newly qualified solicitors retained across several practice areas.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll