header-logo header-logo

01 October 2015
Issue: 7670 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

More banker disputes?

New regulations to make senior bank staff personally responsible or even criminally liable for failings of junior employees could spark a rise in unfair dismissal claims, an employment lawyer has warned.

From March 2016, senior managers at UK banks will be accountable to the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority for regulatory problems occurring within their remit, and will need to demonstrate to the regulator that they took reasonable steps to prevent breaches. Consequently, they may want to pre-emptively dismiss staff members who they believe could put the bank at risk rather than spend time managing their performance, according to Jon Gilligan, partner at GQ Employment Law.

Gilligan says: “The risk is that managers will act in haste and that unfair dismissal or constructive dismissal claims will follow.

“Senior banking staff will not want to take the fall if an underperforming team member puts the bank at risk of regulatory action, but human resources and legal will want to avoid unnecessary employment law claims.”

Issue: 7670 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll