header-logo header-logo

05 June 2008
Issue: 7324 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Legal services
printer mail-detail

More firms sign unified crime contract

Legal news

Demand for the new-look crime unified contract is increasing, with 1,799 firms now signed up to undertake publicly-funded defence services.

The new 18-month contract will apply to legal aid firms across England and Wales in July.

Changes to the contract include a new method for reconciling standard monthly payments; removal of the requirement to record travel costs and time in relation to matters dealt with under fixed fees; and removal of automatic financial penalties for claims submitted more than three months late.

Limits have also been placed on the Legal Services Commission’s (LSC’s) powers to amend the contract to changes arising from external developments in the law or criminal justice system.

Minor changes, as well as errors or omissions, can be corrected with the agreement of the Law Society.

Derek Hill, director of the Criminal Defence Service, says: “I know that criminal solicitors have been dealing with many changes recently and appreciate their continued dedication and hard work. The new contract will
provide a period of certainty for criminal legal aid providers.”

Successful applicants have already been informed. The duty solicitor rotas and slot allocations will be issued in mid-June, to start 14 July 2008.

Issue: 7324 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll