header-logo header-logo

26 May 2021
Issue: 7934 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

More measures needed for protecting witnesses

Intimidated as well as vulnerable witnesses should be allowed to pre-record their evidence in chief and cross examination, a review by Victims’ Commissioner Dame Vera Baird QC has recommended.

This frees the witnesses from having to testify at trial and allows them to have therapy, if they wish, without fearing their notes might be accessed in the trial, according to the review, ‘Next steps for special measures’.

Currently, this option is available under section 28 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 to victims and witnesses deemed vulnerable, and there has been increased take-up of s 28 during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is also being piloted for intimidated witnesses at Leeds, Liverpool and Kingston upon Thames Crown Courts.

Dame Vera recommended it be more widely used for both intimidated and vulnerable witnesses and introduced across all Crown Courts as soon as practically possible, especially where trial dates are a long time in the future.

In all, she makes 21 recommendations, including promoting the closure of the public gallery as a special measure to avoid intimidation during evidence, the development of a national protocol for data collection on special measures, and provision of a separate court entrance for vulnerable and intimidated witnesses.

Dame Vera found special measures were widely praised but there was an over-complicated system for assessing witnesses’ needs and providing support. Magistrates’ courts tended to lag behind in the use of special measures and she said it was ‘urgent to upgrade facilities and boost the Witness Care Unit resources to ensure parity of witness care with the Crown Court’.

Welcoming the review, Ellie Reeves MP, Shadow Solicitor General, said: ‘With record numbers of rape victims withdrawing from prosecutions, and the court backlog now at over 58,000 cases, many survivors feel the system is working against them, not for them. Giving witness testimony can be extremely upsetting and traumatising.’

Issue: 7934 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll