header-logo header-logo

03 December 2025
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Criminal , Immigration & asylum , Housing , Cybercrime
printer mail-detail

More money for legal aid 'a positive step'

Legal aid lawyers have welcomed increased fees for criminal, housing and immigration work

The increase for crime lower work comes into force on 22 December, bringing police station duty solicitor fees to £320 and dropping the escape fee threshold for excess work from £900 to £650. Prison law fees will be uplifted 24% and magistrates’ court, youth court and some appeals raised 10%.

Legislation to increase the crime higher fee will be laid as soon as the changes can be delivered through the Legal Aid Agency digital systems, which have been down since May due to a cyber-attack.

Law Society vice president Brett Dixon described the increase, worth up to £92m, as ‘a positive step forward’.

Justice minister Sarah Sackman also confirmed a £2m boost for licensed housing and immigration work to be delivered as soon as possible, on top of an extra £18m for housing and immigration fees. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll