header-logo header-logo

15 May 2008 / Charles Ciumei , Paul Bury
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A more open competition

Will third-party funding level the litigation playing field? ask Charles Ciumei and Paul Bury

The low number of private damages actions for breach of competition law rules has long been a concern of regulators and practitioners in the EU and the UK. One of the main problem areas is the difficulty that many potential litigants face in obtaining funding for private actions due to the high costs and high risks involved. In November 2007, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) published its recommendations to facilitate private actions by businesses and consumers (OFT916, Private Actions in Competition Law: Effective Redress for Consumers and Businesses). To address the issue of funding, the OFT recommended that “third-party funding is an important potential source of funding…[and] should be encouraged”.

Previously, little attention was paid to the possibilities of third-party litigation funding in the UK, which was largely confined to insolvency cases and was viewed by many with scepticism. However, the OFT's recommendations are part of a significant change in attitudes to third-party litigation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll