header-logo header-logo

15 May 2008 / Charles Ciumei , Paul Bury
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A more open competition

Will third-party funding level the litigation playing field? ask Charles Ciumei and Paul Bury

The low number of private damages actions for breach of competition law rules has long been a concern of regulators and practitioners in the EU and the UK. One of the main problem areas is the difficulty that many potential litigants face in obtaining funding for private actions due to the high costs and high risks involved. In November 2007, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) published its recommendations to facilitate private actions by businesses and consumers (OFT916, Private Actions in Competition Law: Effective Redress for Consumers and Businesses). To address the issue of funding, the OFT recommended that “third-party funding is an important potential source of funding…[and] should be encouraged”.

Previously, little attention was paid to the possibilities of third-party litigation funding in the UK, which was largely confined to insolvency cases and was viewed by many with scepticism. However, the OFT's recommendations are part of a significant change in attitudes to third-party litigation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll