header-logo header-logo

A more open competition

15 May 2008 / Charles Ciumei , Paul Bury
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Will third-party funding level the litigation playing field? ask Charles Ciumei and Paul Bury

The low number of private damages actions for breach of competition law rules has long been a concern of regulators and practitioners in the EU and the UK. One of the main problem areas is the difficulty that many potential litigants face in obtaining funding for private actions due to the high costs and high risks involved. In November 2007, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) published its recommendations to facilitate private actions by businesses and consumers (OFT916, Private Actions in Competition Law: Effective Redress for Consumers and Businesses). To address the issue of funding, the OFT recommended that “third-party funding is an important potential source of funding…[and] should be encouraged”.

Previously, little attention was paid to the possibilities of third-party litigation funding in the UK, which was largely confined to insolvency cases and was viewed by many with scepticism. However, the OFT's recommendations are part of a significant change in attitudes to third-party litigation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll