header-logo header-logo

27 March 2026 / David Burrows
Issue: 8155 / Categories: Features , Family , Practice areas
printer mail-detail

More than two sides?

245640
David Burrows explores examples where a non-party can join a case about who gets what in the divorce
  • When should a non-party be joined in family financial provision proceedings?
  • Identify preliminary issues, add any non-party relevant to that issue and order prior hearing as appropriate.
  • When is it ‘desirable’ to add; and will this result in a separate trial of a preliminary issue?

This article considers how preliminary issues in financial provision (divorce or civil partnership) proceedings can, or should, be dealt with; and, in appropriate cases, it deals with the adding of non-parties according to the extent of their interest.

The article is prompted in part by the February appeal decision of Ms Justice Henke in Archer v Archer & others [2026] EWHC 468 (Fam). Henke J has sent the case back for rehearing (for facts).

Addition of non-parties

When the then ‘new ancillary relief scheme’ was introduced in 1996 for Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) financial provision cases (a scheme adopted also for Civil Partnership

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll