header-logo header-logo

16 March 2007
Issue: 7264 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

More women on the bench

Four out of 10 newly appointed judges are women, according to government statistics.

For the year between April 2005 and March 2006, 200 of 337 appointees were men (59%) and 137 were women (41%). Additionally, 84% were white while 14% were black or ethnic minority candidates (BME)—six were listed as unknown. The new judges were, on average, 50 years old and had completed roughly 13.6 years of legal practice.

The latest figures compare favourably to those for the previous year when 69% were men, 31% were women and 9% were BME candidates.

Vera Baird, Equalities Minister at the Department for Constitutional Affairs, says increasing diversity in the judiciary is a key priority.

Baroness Usha Prashar, chair of the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC), says: “The JAC selects candidates for judicial office on merit and merit alone. We are committed to widening the range of applicants for judicial appointment and to ensuring that the very best eligible candidates are drawn from a wider range of backgrounds.”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll