header-logo header-logo

02 November 2022
Issue: 8001 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology , Media
printer mail-detail

More work needed to support open justice

The decline of local newspapers has resulted in court proceedings being less visible to the public, and digital media has so far failed to fill the gap, a parliamentary committee has warned.

Those regional titles that remain are no longer able to send reporters to court on a regular basis, the Justice Committee highlighted in a report published this week, ‘Open justice: court reporting in the digital age’. It heard evidence that the quality of publicly available information can often be poor and basic data about court proceedings unavailable. The committee also heard complaints about a lack of access to key documents submitted to courts making it difficult to follow proceedings. 

Consequently, the committee urged the court system to do more to support open justice in the digital age. It called on courts to remove barriers to the media and members of the public attending court proceedings, and urged the government to do more to support digital platforms to cover court decisions.

The committee called for the creation of a single, digital portal where the media and public can access full information on court proceedings, court documents and other relevant information. It urged that every court have a publicised point of contact that supports access, provides information and answers queries. Holding open days would also send a message about open justice, it said.

Moreover, new technologies offer new opportunities—remote proceedings could make courts more accessible for reporters; social media supports instant reporting and live updates; and the broadcasting of sentencing remarks could be extended from Crown courts to other courts.

The committee also called for greater transparency in family courts, and branded the legislative framework on reporting on family proceedings no longer fit for purpose and in need of review and reform.

Justice Committee chair Sir Bob Neill said: ‘Too often, significant patience and tenacity is required to access court proceedings that it is our democratic right to witness.

‘The Courts & Tribunal Service needs to do more [to] remove barriers to the media and public coming to court rooms, not just by doing more to publicise information but actually welcoming them in and showing how the justice system works.’

Issue: 8001 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology , Media
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
back-to-top-scroll