header-logo header-logo

02 November 2022
Issue: 8001 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology , Media
printer mail-detail

More work needed to support open justice

The decline of local newspapers has resulted in court proceedings being less visible to the public, and digital media has so far failed to fill the gap, a parliamentary committee has warned.

Those regional titles that remain are no longer able to send reporters to court on a regular basis, the Justice Committee highlighted in a report published this week, ‘Open justice: court reporting in the digital age’. It heard evidence that the quality of publicly available information can often be poor and basic data about court proceedings unavailable. The committee also heard complaints about a lack of access to key documents submitted to courts making it difficult to follow proceedings. 

Consequently, the committee urged the court system to do more to support open justice in the digital age. It called on courts to remove barriers to the media and members of the public attending court proceedings, and urged the government to do more to support digital platforms to cover court decisions.

The committee called for the creation of a single, digital portal where the media and public can access full information on court proceedings, court documents and other relevant information. It urged that every court have a publicised point of contact that supports access, provides information and answers queries. Holding open days would also send a message about open justice, it said.

Moreover, new technologies offer new opportunities—remote proceedings could make courts more accessible for reporters; social media supports instant reporting and live updates; and the broadcasting of sentencing remarks could be extended from Crown courts to other courts.

The committee also called for greater transparency in family courts, and branded the legislative framework on reporting on family proceedings no longer fit for purpose and in need of review and reform.

Justice Committee chair Sir Bob Neill said: ‘Too often, significant patience and tenacity is required to access court proceedings that it is our democratic right to witness.

‘The Courts & Tribunal Service needs to do more [to] remove barriers to the media and public coming to court rooms, not just by doing more to publicise information but actually welcoming them in and showing how the justice system works.’

Issue: 8001 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology , Media
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll