header-logo header-logo

02 November 2022
Issue: 8001 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology , Media
printer mail-detail

More work needed to support open justice

The decline of local newspapers has resulted in court proceedings being less visible to the public, and digital media has so far failed to fill the gap, a parliamentary committee has warned.

Those regional titles that remain are no longer able to send reporters to court on a regular basis, the Justice Committee highlighted in a report published this week, ‘Open justice: court reporting in the digital age’. It heard evidence that the quality of publicly available information can often be poor and basic data about court proceedings unavailable. The committee also heard complaints about a lack of access to key documents submitted to courts making it difficult to follow proceedings. 

Consequently, the committee urged the court system to do more to support open justice in the digital age. It called on courts to remove barriers to the media and members of the public attending court proceedings, and urged the government to do more to support digital platforms to cover court decisions.

The committee called for the creation of a single, digital portal where the media and public can access full information on court proceedings, court documents and other relevant information. It urged that every court have a publicised point of contact that supports access, provides information and answers queries. Holding open days would also send a message about open justice, it said.

Moreover, new technologies offer new opportunities—remote proceedings could make courts more accessible for reporters; social media supports instant reporting and live updates; and the broadcasting of sentencing remarks could be extended from Crown courts to other courts.

The committee also called for greater transparency in family courts, and branded the legislative framework on reporting on family proceedings no longer fit for purpose and in need of review and reform.

Justice Committee chair Sir Bob Neill said: ‘Too often, significant patience and tenacity is required to access court proceedings that it is our democratic right to witness.

‘The Courts & Tribunal Service needs to do more [to] remove barriers to the media and public coming to court rooms, not just by doing more to publicise information but actually welcoming them in and showing how the justice system works.’

Issue: 8001 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology , Media
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll