header-logo header-logo

31 March 2021 / Cecily Crampin , Tricia Hemans
Issue: 7927 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Mortgage receivership: transfer challenges

44716
Post-Maymask, Cecily Crampin & Tricia Hemans consider the effect of mortgage receivership on company directors’ powers to deal with property
  • Ghai v Maymask (228) Ltd [2020] UKUT 293 (LC): does the appointment of a receiver act to suspend the director of a company borrower’s authority to effect a valid sale of the property so that only the receiver can sell or so that the borrower can only sell with the receiver’s consent?

In a typical sale of mortgaged property, the owner of the property sells it to a buyer in his own name and then uses the purchase money provided by the buyer to pay off the mortgage so that the property acquired by the buyer is free of the mortgage. But what about the situation where a receiver has been appointed before the sale? Does the borrower retain the ability to execute a valid transfer to the buyer?

It is clear that the borrower has a power of sale by reason of his ownership of and registration

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll