header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 June 2014
Issue: 7610 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Motor insurance—Rights of third parties against insurers—Duty of insurers to satisfy judgments against insured persons

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Delaney v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] EWHC 1785 (QB), [2014] All ER (D) 31 (Jun)

Queen’s Bench Division, Jay J, 3 Jun 2014

The UK has been held to be in plain breach of EU law for the claimant motor vehicle passenger’s failure to recover damages under the Uninsured Drivers' Agreement 1999

Philip Moser QC and Eric Metcalfe (instructed by Pinto Potts Solicitors) for the claimant. Brain Kennelly and Tom Cleaver (instructed by Treasury Solicitor) for the defendant.

The claimant was a front seat passenger in a car driven by SP. Owing to SP’s negligence, a serious road traffic accident took place and the claimant sustained severe personal injuries. Members of the emergency services discovered a bag containing 240 grams of cannabis under the front of the claimant’s jacket. SP’s insurers avoided the policy on various grounds and therefore the Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB) as insurer of last resort became liable under the Uninsured Drivers’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
NLJ this week: Diamond rings and broken promises

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: The battle over medical report fees intensifies
Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll