header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
23 October 2014 / HH Judge Simon Brown KC
Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Mount Mitchell

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

HH Judge Simon Brown QC reflects on Mitchell’s eruption in civil justice & its aftershocks 

Civil Justice is surprisingly volcanic: it violently erupts periodically into reform and then subsides for the next 20 years or so until the next build up of pressure caused by delay and excessive cost.

1990s

The last previous major eruption was in the 1990’s which produced the new civil justice landscape of CPR and the Arbitration Act 1996. Lord Woolf had recommended five big changes (ROCES) in 1994: 

  • Rules: a new book with simpler rules without procedural case law;
  • Overriding objective: aiming at accessible justice for all at proportionate cost;
  • Case management: taken over from the parties by the judges;
  • Estimates: agreed by the parties or approved by the court; and
  • Sanctions: for disobedience of rules and orders.

Each of these were effected by CPR five years later but not before a vigorous debate about “sanctions”: 

  • Professor Zuckerman wrote that “the proposed sanctions
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll