header-logo header-logo

22 March 2017
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

MPs debate whiplash

The Prison and Courts Bill, which will set up online civil courts and introduce fixed tariffs to cap compensation for whiplash claims, has passed the second reading stage without amendment.

Compensation will be limited to £225 for injuries lasting three months, rising to £3,725 for an injury that lasts for two years.

The Bill also bans the settlement of whiplash claims without medical evidence, provides for more investment in IT in courts, and ends the cross-examination of domestic violence victims by their abusive ex-partners in the family courts.

Speaking in the debate, justice minister Oliver Heald noted there had been a 50% increase in claims over the past decade.

“These cases are obviously exaggerated to some extent, and perhaps fraudulent,” he said.

“No government could ignore these sorts of statistics and not take action. We have not taken extreme options but gone for moderate options such as a tariff of damages for the very minor cases.”

Earlier in the week, Neil Sugarman, president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, warned: “The government’s so-called solution to high motor premiums is to reduce how much compensation people with genuine injuries will receive to derisory levels, and make the claims process more difficult and off-putting for the public.”

Issue: 7739 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll