header-logo header-logo

MPs debate whiplash reform

05 September 2018
Issue: 7807 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Lawyers urge MPs to ‘take government to task’ over Civil Liability Bill

Personal injury lawyers have highlighted ‘gaping holes’ in the Civil Liability Bill, as MPs gathered for its second reading.

The bill will introduce a system of fixed tariffs for whiplash damages. Secondary legislation will raise the small claims limit from £1,000 to £5,000 for road traffic accident claims.

Vidisha Joshi, managing partner of Hodge Jones & Allen, said: ‘It’s up to MPs to highlight the gaping holes in this highly questionable bill.

‘It is staggering that such fundamental reform can be based on such flimsy or non-existent evidence—for example, the Ministry of Justice has never explained, despite even the Justice Select Committee asking, how it came up with the figures in the new compensation tariff. What we do know, however, is that the number of claims is falling, while both premiums and insurers’ profits are rising.

‘MPs must also take the government to task over the increase in the small claims limit for personal injury cases, which is so fundamental to the reform programme but is not actually in the bill.’

In a briefing note to MPs, the Personal Injuries Bar Association (PIBA) and Bar Council argued both that the bill’s definition of ‘whiplash injury’ was too wide, and that the bill should not give the Lord Chancellor the power to amend the definition in response to future medical developments.

On the proposals for tariffs, they said there was no evidence to support the suggested level of them. Moreover, there had not been enough time for the effect of recent changes to personal injury claims to become known: for example, the requirement that courts strike out claims that are tainted by dishonesty (s 57, Criminal Courts and Justice Act 2015) and the funding reforms introduced by LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012).

Issue: 7807 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll