header-logo header-logo

05 September 2018
Issue: 7807 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

MPs debate whiplash reform

Lawyers urge MPs to ‘take government to task’ over Civil Liability Bill

Personal injury lawyers have highlighted ‘gaping holes’ in the Civil Liability Bill, as MPs gathered for its second reading.

The bill will introduce a system of fixed tariffs for whiplash damages. Secondary legislation will raise the small claims limit from £1,000 to £5,000 for road traffic accident claims.

Vidisha Joshi, managing partner of Hodge Jones & Allen, said: ‘It’s up to MPs to highlight the gaping holes in this highly questionable bill.

‘It is staggering that such fundamental reform can be based on such flimsy or non-existent evidence—for example, the Ministry of Justice has never explained, despite even the Justice Select Committee asking, how it came up with the figures in the new compensation tariff. What we do know, however, is that the number of claims is falling, while both premiums and insurers’ profits are rising.

‘MPs must also take the government to task over the increase in the small claims limit for personal injury cases, which is so fundamental to the reform programme but is not actually in the bill.’

In a briefing note to MPs, the Personal Injuries Bar Association (PIBA) and Bar Council argued both that the bill’s definition of ‘whiplash injury’ was too wide, and that the bill should not give the Lord Chancellor the power to amend the definition in response to future medical developments.

On the proposals for tariffs, they said there was no evidence to support the suggested level of them. Moreover, there had not been enough time for the effect of recent changes to personal injury claims to become known: for example, the requirement that courts strike out claims that are tainted by dishonesty (s 57, Criminal Courts and Justice Act 2015) and the funding reforms introduced by LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012).

Issue: 7807 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll