header-logo header-logo

18 December 2013
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

MPs slate residence test

Committee warns access to justice could be compromised

Domestic violence victims and children should be excluded from the government’s proposed residence test for civil legal aid, say MPs.

In a report published last week, the Joint Committee on Human Rights warned that access to justice could be compromised unless more exemptions are included in the test, which would restrict legal aid to those lawfully resident in the UK for at least 12 months.

They recommended that the residence test be introduced through primary legislation to allow for more Parliamentary scrutiny; called for all children to be automatically exempt from the test; asked for the exemptions to include victims of domestic violence; and concluded that the test could deprive individuals who lack mental capacity and cannot litigate in person access to justice.

The Committee also called for changes to proposed restrictions on legal aid for prisoner cases, including urgent reform to the internal prison complaints system to place the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman on a statutory footing with guaranteed independence. The Legal Aid Agency (LAA) should be able to grant funding for certain cases, for example, those involving prisoners with mental health difficulties, and young offenders, they said.

They criticised plans to remove funding for “borderline” cases, where it is not possible for the LAA to decide if the case has a poor chance or a more than 50% chance, as “raising equality of arms issues”.

Hywel Francis MP, chair of the committee, says: “We would urge the government not to fall into the trap of knowing the price of everything but the value of nothing. We are particularly worried about the impact of the residence test on vulnerable groups such as children or victims of domestic violence.”

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll