header-logo header-logo

22 January 2016 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , CPR
printer mail-detail

Much ado about nothing

nlj_7683_regan

The Supreme Court has taken a rare look at CPR, notes Dominic Regan

It is exceptional for the Supreme Court to go anywhere near the lifeblood of litigators, the Civil Procedure Rules. Arcane points of abstract law are adored. The dull dross of court rules is not erotic. Well, they donned thick marigold gloves and took on an appeal which indirectly touched upon the dreaded Mitchell saga in Theverajah v Riordan [2015] UKSC 78, [2015] All ER (D) 146 (Dec).

Thevarajah

Mr Thavathera Thevarajah was the claimant. He sued Mr Riordan and others. An “unless” order was made in June 2013, shortly after the Jackson reforms were implemented. The terms of the order directed that, in the event of non-compliance, the defence and counterclaim be struck out and the defendant be debarred from defending.

It was held that the order had not been honoured and so the sanctions applied. Relief was refused but on a second application a Deputy High Court Judge, after a hearing that unbelievably took four days, granted relief by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll