header-logo header-logo

22 January 2016 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , CPR
printer mail-detail

Much ado about nothing

nlj_7683_regan

The Supreme Court has taken a rare look at CPR, notes Dominic Regan

It is exceptional for the Supreme Court to go anywhere near the lifeblood of litigators, the Civil Procedure Rules. Arcane points of abstract law are adored. The dull dross of court rules is not erotic. Well, they donned thick marigold gloves and took on an appeal which indirectly touched upon the dreaded Mitchell saga in Theverajah v Riordan [2015] UKSC 78, [2015] All ER (D) 146 (Dec).

Thevarajah

Mr Thavathera Thevarajah was the claimant. He sued Mr Riordan and others. An “unless” order was made in June 2013, shortly after the Jackson reforms were implemented. The terms of the order directed that, in the event of non-compliance, the defence and counterclaim be struck out and the defendant be debarred from defending.

It was held that the order had not been honoured and so the sanctions applied. Relief was refused but on a second application a Deputy High Court Judge, after a hearing that unbelievably took four days, granted relief by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll