header-logo header-logo

Much ado about nothing

22 January 2016 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , CPR
printer mail-detail
nlj_7683_regan

The Supreme Court has taken a rare look at CPR, notes Dominic Regan

It is exceptional for the Supreme Court to go anywhere near the lifeblood of litigators, the Civil Procedure Rules. Arcane points of abstract law are adored. The dull dross of court rules is not erotic. Well, they donned thick marigold gloves and took on an appeal which indirectly touched upon the dreaded Mitchell saga in Theverajah v Riordan [2015] UKSC 78, [2015] All ER (D) 146 (Dec).

Thevarajah

Mr Thavathera Thevarajah was the claimant. He sued Mr Riordan and others. An “unless” order was made in June 2013, shortly after the Jackson reforms were implemented. The terms of the order directed that, in the event of non-compliance, the defence and counterclaim be struck out and the defendant be debarred from defending.

It was held that the order had not been honoured and so the sanctions applied. Relief was refused but on a second application a Deputy High Court Judge, after a hearing that unbelievably took four days, granted relief by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll