header-logo header-logo

09 September 2011 / Jennifer Lee
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Features , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

Much obliged

Jennifer Lee assesses the level of obligation owed by employers to former employees

The recent case of McKie v Swindon College [2011] EWHC 469 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 128 (May) has extended the obligations owed by a former employer to a former employee when commenting on his performance. The case did not concern comments made in a reference, but rather in an e-mail sent six years after the former employee had left his employment.

Obligations to former employees

Case law had, until recently, been limited to establishing that an employer owed a duty of care in providing a reference about an employee or former employee where it was foreseeable that any information provided would be relied upon by a prospective employer and, therefore, potentially cause loss to that employee. If the employer breaches that duty and the employee suffers economic loss as a result, he can claim damages either for negligent misstatement or breach of contract.

This principle derives from the House of Lords’ decision in Spring v Guardian Assurance plc [1995]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll