header-logo header-logo

Much obliged

09 September 2011 / Jennifer Lee
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Features , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

Jennifer Lee assesses the level of obligation owed by employers to former employees

The recent case of McKie v Swindon College [2011] EWHC 469 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 128 (May) has extended the obligations owed by a former employer to a former employee when commenting on his performance. The case did not concern comments made in a reference, but rather in an e-mail sent six years after the former employee had left his employment.

Obligations to former employees

Case law had, until recently, been limited to establishing that an employer owed a duty of care in providing a reference about an employee or former employee where it was foreseeable that any information provided would be relied upon by a prospective employer and, therefore, potentially cause loss to that employee. If the employer breaches that duty and the employee suffers economic loss as a result, he can claim damages either for negligent misstatement or breach of contract.

This principle derives from the House of Lords’ decision in Spring v Guardian Assurance plc [1995]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll