header-logo header-logo

09 September 2011 / Jennifer Lee
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Features , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

Much obliged

Jennifer Lee assesses the level of obligation owed by employers to former employees

The recent case of McKie v Swindon College [2011] EWHC 469 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 128 (May) has extended the obligations owed by a former employer to a former employee when commenting on his performance. The case did not concern comments made in a reference, but rather in an e-mail sent six years after the former employee had left his employment.

Obligations to former employees

Case law had, until recently, been limited to establishing that an employer owed a duty of care in providing a reference about an employee or former employee where it was foreseeable that any information provided would be relied upon by a prospective employer and, therefore, potentially cause loss to that employee. If the employer breaches that duty and the employee suffers economic loss as a result, he can claim damages either for negligent misstatement or breach of contract.

This principle derives from the House of Lords’ decision in Spring v Guardian Assurance plc [1995]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll