header-logo header-logo

Multi-jurisdictional cases in England & Russia (Pt 2)

50767
Anna Grishchenkova, Daniel Burbeary & Irina Buydova explore the impact of cultural & psychological differences in international dispute resolution
  • In disputes involving multiple parties of different nationalities, cultural and psychological differences can play a major part in misunderstandings both between parties and the court, and the parties themselves.

International dispute resolution is complex and involves balancing a host of differences between parties, their legal advisers, the court or tribunal, and the arbitral institutions themselves. Cultural differences can play a major part in misunderstandings between parties. Different expectations of the range of possible outcomes and tactics can create friction between a party and its legal advisers. Moreover, the consequences of a party’s actions in terms of how they present to the tribunal can be significant—in some cases, even proving fatal to their case.

This article will examine how psychological factors can impact significantly on the resolution of international disputes. Psychological tools provide valuable insights into how parties, their lawyers and the tribunal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll