header-logo header-logo

24 November 2023 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Profession
printer mail-detail

Musing of an executor

147347
Driven to distraction by financial & other businesses failing to respond to essential enquiries? Stephen Gold recommends taking the compensation route

Your probate colleagues will tell you that they can match your high blood pressure. Delays in prizing grants out of the probate service are legion. What is not readily apparent is that HMCTS, which enjoys responsibility for the service, is obliged to entertain complaints about delays under the same scheme that applies to mess ups in the courts and tribunals. And that the scheme enables the payment of compensation where a complaint is upheld is not exactly shouted from the Petty France rooftops. Indeed, in the just updated guidance on complaints, the availability of compensation remains a secret but does provide a link to an online ‘thank you’ form. I come fresh from complaining to HMCTS about what transpired to be a period of 10.5 weeks during which my online application for probate as executor of my late aunt’s estate went to sleep.

I secured a £50 without prejudice goodwill

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll