header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 August 2014 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A muted celebration

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
backpage_robins

Jon Robins signs off for the summer with some reflections on the trappings & failures of high office

Legal aid reached the grand old age of 65 years last month—retirement age, as a number of commentators pointed out. Obviously there was little cause for celebration this year, however, the occasion was duly acknowledged by all. Well, not quite. There was a conspicuous silence from the Ministry of Justice.

Legal aid was born at 11.47am, 30 July 1949. I know this because the information appeared on a special website that the Legal Services Commission (as it was then) launched for legal aid’s “Big 60”. While the website has since been decommissioned, happily it is preserved in the national archives.

Legal aid was hardly in rude health five years ago and yet the site existed to “celebrate” the success and achievements of public funded law. In fact, the Commission went on tour from Truro to Birmingham espousing the values of legal aid, evidenced by the claim that “if this exhibition means only two more people seek

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll