header-logo header-logo

Mutuals: getting into a spin?

23 November 2012 / Tom Metcalfe
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Tom Metcalfe advises a careful approach to the drafting of articles of association of mutuals

With the tightening of the public purse came increasing pressure on central government to find new ways of maximising the efficiency of public service provision. This has fuelled a new drive to build a “big society” based on shifting power from state institutions to employee-led organisations. This is a particular type of social enterprise known as mutualisation or “spinning out”.

Mutuals can take a range of forms, making narrow definition difficult. Thus, the three attributes of mutuals identified by the Cabinet Office’s Mutuals Task Force report Public service mutuals—the next steps are a useful starting point. Mutuals are said to be organisations which have left the public sector, but which continue to deliver public services and give employees significant control over their operation. If we look beyond the policy documents though, there has been little legislative development to facilitate the government’s mutualisation agenda.

This is important because the EU public procurement directives apply if contacting authorities

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll