header-logo header-logo

23 November 2012 / Tom Metcalfe
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Mutuals: getting into a spin?

Tom Metcalfe advises a careful approach to the drafting of articles of association of mutuals

With the tightening of the public purse came increasing pressure on central government to find new ways of maximising the efficiency of public service provision. This has fuelled a new drive to build a “big society” based on shifting power from state institutions to employee-led organisations. This is a particular type of social enterprise known as mutualisation or “spinning out”.

Mutuals can take a range of forms, making narrow definition difficult. Thus, the three attributes of mutuals identified by the Cabinet Office’s Mutuals Task Force report Public service mutuals—the next steps are a useful starting point. Mutuals are said to be organisations which have left the public sector, but which continue to deliver public services and give employees significant control over their operation. If we look beyond the policy documents though, there has been little legislative development to facilitate the government’s mutualisation agenda.

This is important because the EU public procurement directives apply if contacting authorities

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll