header-logo header-logo

Mutuals: getting into a spin?

23 November 2012 / Tom Metcalfe
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Tom Metcalfe advises a careful approach to the drafting of articles of association of mutuals

With the tightening of the public purse came increasing pressure on central government to find new ways of maximising the efficiency of public service provision. This has fuelled a new drive to build a “big society” based on shifting power from state institutions to employee-led organisations. This is a particular type of social enterprise known as mutualisation or “spinning out”.

Mutuals can take a range of forms, making narrow definition difficult. Thus, the three attributes of mutuals identified by the Cabinet Office’s Mutuals Task Force report Public service mutuals—the next steps are a useful starting point. Mutuals are said to be organisations which have left the public sector, but which continue to deliver public services and give employees significant control over their operation. If we look beyond the policy documents though, there has been little legislative development to facilitate the government’s mutualisation agenda.

This is important because the EU public procurement directives apply if contacting authorities

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll